Skip to content

Regulation

Haitian TPS termination is now in effect after Mullin

By Editorial TeamUpdated Aug 25, 2026
Authority
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Rule type
regulation
Jurisdiction scope
US federal
Effective date
Jul 27, 2026
Source text
Read primary rule text ↗

Follow DHS termination of Haitian TPS; updated USCIS/E-Verify guidance applies.

Last verified: Aug. 25, 2026. This is a status record, not legal advice. The operative posture is straightforward now: Haitian TPS termination is in effect, the July 27, 2026 termination date controls, the blocking stay was lifted on Aug. 5, 2026, and only the equal protection claims in Miot v. Trump remain pending before Judge Reyes with discovery proceeding.

Legal research desk with a government document, red stamp, desk calendar, gavel, fountain pen, and reading glasses

The earlier record matters here only because it explains why the dates kept moving. Haiti's TPS path runs through the 2010 designation, the 2018 Ramos and Saget litigation, and the 2021 and 2023 redesignations, but those milestones are context for the current status, not the current status itself [8].

Record of the termination

DateIssuer or eventEffect on Haiti TPSVerification
Feb. 24, 2025Partial vacatur of the 2024 Haiti TPS decisionRestored the Feb. 3, 2026 extension end date into the operative record [2]Primary-source notice
Nov. 28, 2025DHS Federal Register termination noticePublished the termination decision and estimated about 352,959 Haitian TPS holders; termination set for 11:59 p.m. Feb. 3, 2026 [1]Primary-source notice
Feb. 2, 2026D.D.C. stayBlocked the termination while litigation was pending; E-Verify and USCIS guidance tracked the court order [4][5]Agency guidance describing court order
June 25, 2026Mullin v. DoeForeclosed APA-based review under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(A) and made the termination date operative [3]Controlling Supreme Court opinion
July 29, 2026USCIS releaseConfirmed the post-Mullin operational guidance and the July 27, 2026 termination effect [5]Agency guidance
Aug. 4-5, 2026Mandate issued, then stay lift reportedThe blocking stay was no longer in effect; the termination stayed operative while constitutional claims continued [6][7]Practitioner-reported docket tail

The main legal hinge is Mullin. The Court did not open a new merits path for APA challenges to a TPS termination; it closed that path under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(A), which means the fight over arbitrary-and-capricious review and procedural consultation no longer controls the status question [3]. In practical terms, Mullin shifted the record away from APA review and left the later stay order and the surviving constitutional claims to determine whether anything still blocked the termination.

Horizontal timeline with five milestone nodes showing the legal progression from notice to court orders

That distinction matters because some of the July references were never stable enough to cite without checking the primary source again. USCIS and E-Verify moved through changing operational placeholders in July before settling on the July 27 termination date, so earlier firm alerts tied to July 1, July 10, or July 24 are now superseded by the later agency release and the Supreme Court's controlling opinion [4][5].

What remains pending

The case does not end with Mullin. The remaining live litigation is the constitutional equal protection track in Miot v. Trump, No. 25-cv-02471-ACR, still before Judge Reyes, with discovery proceeding. Practitioner reports of the Aug. 5, 2026 order say the stay is no longer in effect, which changes the practical posture immediately, but it does not erase the separate constitutional claims [6][7].

Two diverging paths, one blocked by a gate and one leading to a document under a magnifying glass

For anyone working the record the next morning, the clean reading is narrow. The termination is operative. APA-based attacks are foreclosed in this posture. The stay that had been holding the termination back is reported as lifted. What still needs monitoring is whether the surviving constitutional claims in Miot produce a new order, a new agency notice, or a docket entry that changes the status again [3][6][7].

References

  1. Termination of the Designation of Haiti for Temporary Protected Status, 90 FR 54733 (Nov. 28, 2025), Federal Register,
  2. Partial Vacatur of 2024 Temporary Protected Status Decision for Haiti, 90 FR (Feb. 24, 2025), Federal Register,
  3. Mullin v. Doe, No. 25-1083, slip op. (U.S. June 25, 2026), Supreme Court,
  4. Update on Termination of TPS for Haiti (archived, Feb. 14, 2026), E-Verify,
  5. Update on Termination of Temporary Protected Status for Haiti (Release: July 29, 2026), USCIS,
  6. D.C. District Court Lifts Stay Blocking Termination of Haiti TPS (Aug. 2026), Jackson Lewis Global Immigration Blog,
  7. Court Takes Action on Haiti TPS Termination Plus Other TPS Updates (Aug. 6, 2026), Wolfsdorf,
  8. DHS terminates TPS for Haiti, Immigration Policy Tracking Project,

Operationalizing workflow

No workflow has been explicitly linked to this obligation yet. See Workflows generally.

Illustrative cases

No illustrative case is currently tracked for this obligation. See Risk Digest for documented incidents generally.

← Back to Regulation

Report a correction or tip

Spotted an outdated figure, a misstated fact, or a ruling this regulation entry should reflect? Public comments are disabled for this content given the professional cost of a misreported case outcome, penalty amount, or rule text — use the structured correction channel instead.

Report a correction or tip for this record →