Workflows
Human-in-the-loop checklists and decision trees that practitioners use before filing or relying on AI-assisted research or drafting (citation verification steps, client-disclosure decision trees, vendor due-diligence checklists, AI acceptable-use policy templates). Structured as numbered task flows and downloadable templates, not narrative essays. Each workflow explicitly cites the Risk Digest cases that motivate its steps and links to relevant Benchmarks entries where tool choice affects the risk. Does not contain case outcomes (Risk Digest) or binding regulatory text (Obligations).
AI Legal Research Workflow: Human Verification Steps Practitioners Actually Use
A structured guide to where AI is inserted in the legal research workflow, what hallucination and citation risks practitioners have documented, and the specific human-in-the-loop verification steps attorneys and legal ops teams apply before relying on AI-generated output.
How to Track SSA's AI Tools Through the Appeals Process
The SSA has deployed multiple AI tools across its four-level appeals process, but no public source tracks which tools touched a specific claim. This article inventories those tools and identifies the verification obligations practitioners face as of mid-2026.
Why attorneys can't rely on SSA's status tracker
Disability attorneys who depend on SSA's new Claim Status Tracker need to understand its documented accuracy limitations and implement cross-verification steps to avoid missing critical deadlines. This article explains why the tracker alone is insufficient and provides actionable verification workflows.