Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
Filtered by tag jurisdiction-us-federal — clear filter
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionMaryland, United StatesCourtHoward County Circuit CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 10, 2026How the Eric Adjepong Protective Order Case Maps Multi-Docket Risk
This analysis of the Eric Adjepong protective order litigation shows how protective orders can produce conflicting outcomes across civil, criminal, and child-protective systems on identical allegations, and identifies procedural risk signals for attorneys managing high-conflict custody cases with overlapping court dockets.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 24, 2026How the Amy's Kitchen soup recall tests class action standing
Assesses whether Amy's Kitchen's June 2026 voluntary recall of 184,200 cans of Organic Lentil Soup will lead to certifiable consumer class actions, and evaluates the strength of an Article III standing defense given the FDA Class II classification and the company's documented recall history. No class action has been publicly filed as of July 24, 2026.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionMarylandCourtAppellate Court of MarylandToolLexis+ AIRuling dateOct 1, 2025M&T Bank Stadium Urination Shows AI Hallucination Risk for MD Law
The July 2026 M&T Bank Stadium public indecency incident serves as a concrete test case for AI legal research hallucination risk when a Maryland attorney queries Code §11-107 and the 2024 HB5 enhanced penalty. This article explains why this query type triggers a documented spike in fabricated citations and why the Mezu v. Mezu precedent would refer any resulting errors to the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Last verified
CASE-STATUS-REPORTEDUpdatedJurisdictionjurisdiction-us-federalCourtRussian Judicial SystemToolPravosudiyeRuling dateOct 1, 2024What the Ukraine Court Hack Means for Cross-Border Litigation
The October 2024 pro-Ukraine hack on Russia's Pravosudiye court system destroyed approximately 89 million electronic case files—one-third of the consolidated national archive—and permanently erased backups stored in a single data center. This article explains why the loss creates a structural evidentiary risk for any cross-border litigation that relies on Russian court records, and what verification steps practitioners should take given surviving local court websites.
Last verified