Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionPeruCourtPeruvian civil courtsToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateAug 1, 2026Nazca crash victims' legal rights under Peru's Ley 27261
The Aug 1, 2026 Aerodiana crash near Nazca killed 13 people on a domestic Peruvian overflight, which means the families' claims are governed by Peru's Ley 27261 — not the Montreal Convention. The record separates confirmed facts from reported details and maps the statute's advance-payment right, two-year prescription, compulsory-insurance route, and the open forum questions for foreign heirs.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionPeruCourtSecond Provincial Penal Corporate Prosecutor’s Office of NascaToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateAug 2, 2026What the Nazca Lines crash investigations mean for liability
As of the Aug 3, 2026 verification stamp, this tracker separates what is confirmed from what is merely reported across the three investigations opened after the Nazca Lines crash — the ICAO Annex 13 safety inquiry, MTC's administrative suspension review, and the Fiscalía criminal case — with each track's deadlines mapped to the liability theories it feeds.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FLCourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of FloridaToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJul 29, 2026Why the Professor's Profane Story Firing Isn't an AI Case
A docket-verified record of Prabhakar v. Hawkins (S.D. Fla.), the lawsuit over a professor's firing for a profane story. It confirms the First Amendment and Fla. Stat. § 1004.097(4)(a) claims — and confirms no AI tool or AI-generated content is implicated, making the case a boundary example rather than an AI-risk incident.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionEngland and WalesCourtHigh Court of England and WalesToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateJul 27, 2026The Legal Implications of the Jason Arday Plagiarism Row
A risk analysis of the Jason Arday plagiarism row focusing on the Defamation Act 2013 burden-of-proof asymmetry and cost-risk dynamics that made the Carter-Ruck pre-publication letter the decisive legal event, rather than the underlying plagiarism allegations.
Last verified
REPORTED/ALLEGED INCIDENTUpdatedJurisdictionUS federal; New York state/localCourtNo court proceeding identifiedToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateWhy Austin Franco's Refusal Isn't an Employment Discrimination Case
The article explains why Austin Franco's statement that he would not work for a Jewish employer does not trigger federal or state employment-discrimination law, and confirms that no lawsuit or administrative charge has been filed as of August 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-ArizonaCourtU.S. District Court for the District of ArizonaToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJul 1, 2026Four claims against Pima County sheriff in Nancy Guthrie case
Searches for the 'claim' against the Pima County Sheriff's Office in the Nancy Guthrie case point to four distinct legal matters against Sheriff Chris Nanos, not one filing — none of them alleges AI-generated content. This verified ledger consolidates each matter's parties, amounts where asserted, courts, filing dates, status, and primary source, last verified August 3, 2026.
Last verified
MIXED: REPORTED AND COURT-CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States — D. Minn. / 8th Cir.CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitToolMobile Fortify, Palantir ELITE, Clearview AIRuling dateFeb 27, 2026The Minnesota ICE cases form a coordinated cluster
Docket-linked records for the Minnesota ICE litigation cluster: at least seven coordinated federal actions challenging Trump-administration ICE enforcement against activists and residents, each keyed to its court, judge, and key rulings. Includes the Chief Judge's 96-order noncompliance finding and the named AI surveillance tools — Mobile Fortify, Palantir ELITE, and Clearview AI — that the constitutional claims implicate.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaToolNoneRuling dateJul 1, 2026Minnesota Anti-ICE Protesters Face Federal Conspiracy Charges
Who the Minnesota anti-ICE protest federal conspiracy case (United States v. Sant) charges, under what counts, and where it stands as of early August 2026: 15 defendants, an eight-count indictment, July 1 not-guilty pleas, a sub-90-day discovery order, and statutory exposure capped at six years on the lead count and ten on destruction of government property. Reported claims — including conflicting arrest tallies and the unverified case caption — are flagged separately from court-confirmed facts pending docket verification.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federalCourtNo court (no filed case)ToolSituational Awareness (fund)Ruling dateJul 31, 2026What the Situational Awareness fund collapse means legally
No lawsuit or enforcement action has been filed in the Situational Awareness fund collapse as of August 3, 2026. This verified record maps the dateable exposure surface counsel should track — the fund's July 31 investor letter, its SEC filings, and Citadel's block purchase — and sets the August 14, 2026 Form 13F as the first watchlist date.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FL, US-FederalCourtMultiple Florida circuit courtsToolNone identifiedRuling dateJul 23, 2026Why Lekaysha Lockhart's USPS theft case has a federal track
The announced charges against USPS letter carrier Lekaysha Lockhart separate into a Florida state felony stack and a latent federal exposure under 18 U.S.C. § 1709 that exists only because she is a postal employee. This record decodes the named charges, flags the statutory mapping and federal track as analysis pending charging documents, and notes that no federal charge has been announced as of August 3, 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States (federal); Ohio (state)CourtNo court adjudication identifiedToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateAug 3, 2026Max Miller abuse case leaves Ohio voters as the only check
No court or ethics panel has adjudicated the abuse allegations against Rep. Max Miller, and with House Ethics, the Office of Congressional Conduct, Speaker Johnson, and Gov. DeWine all deferring, the electoral calendar — including Ohio's August 5 ballot-replacement deadline — has become the only operative accountability mechanism. This record tracks each institutional response with confirmed-versus-reported flags and cross-links to the companion Miller litigation records.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS, UK, EUCourtFTC; UK CMA; European CommissionToolNoneRuling dateAug 2, 2026AstraZeneca–Bristol Myers Squibb merger's antitrust gauntlet
Map the three concurrent reviews — US FTC, UK CMA, European Commission — that a reported $400B AstraZeneca–Bristol Myers Squibb combination would trigger, with HSR timing, second-request mechanics, and each agency's theory of harm on the Opdivo–Imfinzi checkpoint overlap. With the FTC's $13.4B Otezla divestiture against BMS as precedent, the practical question is what divestitures and conditions clearance would require, not whether it is possible.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-PennsylvaniaCourtPennsylvania State Board of MedicineToolCharacter.AI (Emilie)Ruling dateMay 28, 2026Verifying 'Licensed' Claims After MacIntyre's Revocation
One issuing-board verification chain exposes both failure modes of a 'licensed' claim: MacIntyre's Pennsylvania medical license was revoked, while Character.AI's 'Emilie' fabricated a license number. This workflow gives litigators, in-house counsel, and risk staff the repeatable check and the live-docket, last-verified rules that leave no room for undated screenshots.
Last verified
COURT-CONFIRMED; PENDINGUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States; IowaCourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa; Van Buren County, IowaToolNoneRuling dateJul 10, 2026Wuanita Swedlund Faces 34 Animal Neglect Charges in Three Proceedings
A verified, primary-source-anchored breakdown of the three separate legal proceedings against Wuanita Swedlund—federal civil suit, 34-count state criminal case, and state forfeiture—as of August 3, 2026, sourced to court orders, dockets, and charging documents.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-WA (Seattle/King County)CourtOffice of Police Accountability (OPA)ToolChatGPT, Perplexity, TruleoRuling dateJul 30, 2026Andre Sayles inherits Seattle police chief's AI-risk ledger
Seattle/King County's AI-in-policing risk in one dated, source-linked record: SPD's enforcement actions from Truleo's 2023 end through the OPA's 2026 unapproved-ChatGPT finding and the CCTV/ALPR pause, as Andre Sayles becomes interim chief. The three open items he inherits — an SPD-wide AI policy, the privacy/data-governance audit, and the permanent chief search — set the city's near-term risk posture.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionNebraska, USCourtSarpy County District CourtToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateJul 29, 2026What's Confirmed in Anthony Smith's Domestic Violence Case
A verified procedural record of Anthony Smith's pending Sarpy County felony case: the three charges, $500,000 bond terms, and the Aug. 17 district-court arraignment, flagged confirmed versus reported. With the arrest affidavit sealed, the verified record ends where the prosecution's allegations begin.
Last verified
INTRODUCEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. Supreme CourtToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateJul 22, 2026What Brandon Gill's birth tourism bill does to citizenship
Rep. Brandon Gill's "birth tourism bill" (H.R. 9854) is not a visa-enforcement measure: it would rewrite INA section 301(a) (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)) to exclude U.S.-born children of statutory "invaders" from citizenship and bar judicial review of invasion determinations. This record separates H.R. 9854 from the Ban Birth Tourism Act (H.R. 9919/S.1812) and verifies its status as introduced, not enacted, as of August 3, 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionFlorida, USCourtMiami-Dade bond courtToolAI-assisted summariesRuling dateJul 29, 2026Demetrius Byrd knife-arrest charges, verified at the source
Demetrius Byrd's viral arrest coverage has outrun the verified record. This entry anchors the confirmed facts — aggravated assault with a deadly weapon under Fla. Stat. § 784.021, a $5,000 bond, detention on an outstanding domestic-violence warrant, and pending case status as of July 30, 2026 — and flags the $20,000 bond and hearing-date claims as reported, not confirmed.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionTurkeyCourtİstanbul Anatolian duty magistrateToolNoneRuling dateJul 31, 2026Sinem Dedetaş Detention Case, Verified
Verified case record of the Sinem Dedetaş detention as of Aug 3, 2026: charges, remand decision, suspension, and case status, with court- and ministry-confirmed actions separated from reported allegations. No indictment has been publicized, so the financial and whistleblower claims in the matter remain untested.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federal (District of Vermont)CourtU.S. District Court for the District of VermontToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJun 29, 2026What are the border entry rules at the Haskell Free Library?
The Haskell Free Library is not a border crossing: since October 2025, Canadians using the US-side door must first present at a nearby port of entry, and the new Canadian entrance permits only same-door exits. The record details who may use each entrance, what documentation is required, and which exceptions apply, and the June 2026 federal prosecutions confirm these rules are now actively enforced.
Last verified