Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
Filtered by tag jurisdiction-eu — clear filter
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionMassachusettsCourtSuperior Court (Plymouth County)ToolAI-assisted jury selection toolsRuling dateJul 9, 2025Lindsay Clancy Trial Highlights AI Jury Selection Ethical Risks
This article examines the ethical obligations ABA Formal Opinion 517 creates for litigators using AI-assisted jury selection tools, using the Lindsay Clancy trial's complex, mental-health-focused voir dire as a case study to illustrate where compliance gaps are widest.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionOhioCourtFranklin County Municipal CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 22, 2026Criminal and civil liability after Ohio State student's pedestrian death
The driver arrested in the July 22, 2026 Weinland Park crash that killed Ohio State student Sarosh Sheth faces potential aggravated vehicular homicide charges, while the victim's family has a two-year window under Ohio law to file a wrongful death claim with no statutory damage cap.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtNorthern District of OhioToolNo AI toolRuling dateJul 16, 2026Taco Bell Cyclospora Lawsuits Test Strict Product Liability
The article outlines the legal theories, defendants, and settlement benchmarks in the 2026 Taco Bell cyclospora outbreak, providing litigators and defense counsel with a framework for evaluating potential claims and supply-chain liability allocation.
Last verified
NOT A LEGAL CASEUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtNot applicable (article is legal analysis, not a specific court case)ToolNo AI tool mentionedRuling dateJul 25, 2026Employer MMR Vaccine Obligations During the 2026 Measles Outbreak
With the 2026 measles outbreak surpassing 2,260 cases across 44 jurisdictions, employers need to understand their legal authority to mandate MMR vaccination. This analysis distinguishes the enforceable obligations for healthcare employers in states with explicit MMR laws from the ADA/Title VII constraints that limit mandates for non-healthcare employers, including the impact of new 2026 state legislation on policy design.
Last verified
CASE-STATUS-REPORTEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-Federal (Central District of California)CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaToolNoneRuling dateApr 15, 2026Understanding the Ticketmaster Hidden Fees Class Action After the Verdict
This article explains how the April 2026 Live Nation antitrust verdict can be used as a collateral-estoppel argument in the pending Ticketmaster hidden fees class action, and what class members should consider before the July 6 opt-out deadline.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtUnited States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaToolxAIRuling dateMar 4, 2026AI Nationalization: Legal Risks in Three US Ownership Plans
This comparative analysis examines the legal and constitutional barriers facing three active US proposals for government ownership of AI companies – Senator Sanders' sovereign wealth fund bill, the Trump administration's golden-share approach, and OpenAI's voluntary 5% equity offer – helping counsel assess which mechanisms are most vulnerable to constitutional challenge.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtUnited States District CourtToolWaymo autonomous driving systemRuling dateMay 1, 2026Waymo-Uber termination exposes gaps in AV partnership contracts
The May 2026 end of Waymo's Phoenix robotaxi partnership with Uber highlights unresolved contractual questions about IP division, fleet disposition, and post-termination competition — and provides a blueprint for what every autonomous-vehicle partnership agreement should explicitly address.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaToolSAVE databaseRuling dateJun 22, 2026The SAVE Act's Proof-of-Citizenship Requirement Is Likely Unconstitutional
Constitutional analysis of the SAVE Act's proof-of-citizenship registration requirement, distinguishing it from the photo-ID laws upheld in Crawford v. Marion County and arguing it faces a substantially higher likelihood of being struck down under the 24th Amendment's poll-tax prohibition and the Elections Clause.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-federalCourtNo courtToolAWSRuling dateOct 1, 2025The AWS Outage Liability Gap In-House Counsel Can't Ignore
Analyze the contractual, insurance, and regulatory dimensions of AWS outage liability, and identify the audit steps in-house counsel must take to close the gap between limited cloud provider remedies and full downstream exposure.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaToolNoneRuling dateMar 2, 2026Trump-Thune DHS Shutdown: A Legal Analysis
This article examines the statutory and constitutional questions raised by the Trump administration's use of OBBA border-security funds during the 76-day DHS shutdown, including the Neguse v. ICE ruling, the Purpose Statute, and the structural limits of Congress's appropriations power.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionIranCourtNo courtToolGoogle SynthIDRuling dateMar 9, 2026Iran's AI-altered supreme leader photo reveals a legal void
The March 2026 case of Iran state media distributing AI-altered photos of Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei exposes a gap that no existing US or international legal framework directly addresses. This article maps the defamation, right-of-publicity, election-deepfake, and humanitarian-law frameworks that miss this conduct, giving litigators and in-house counsel a risk framework for state-generated synthetic leader imagery.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionNot specifiedCourtNot specifiedToolNoneRuling dateJul 13, 2026FDA Approves First OTC Acetaminophen-Naproxen Pain Combo
This article explains the FDA's July 24, 2026 approval of Tylenol with Naproxen, the first over-the-counter fixed-dose combination of acetaminophen and naproxen sodium, covering clinical evidence, dosing, safety warnings, availability, and the unresolved safety questions consumers should know.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District CourtToolNoneRuling dateMar 16, 2026Legal Challenges to the CDC Vaccine-Autism Link Revision
This article maps the four active lawsuits challenging the CDC's November 2025 vaccine-autism website change and the broader January 2026 immunization schedule overhaul, detailing the legal theories, court rulings, and cascading liability risks for vaccine manufacturers and public health agencies.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtNot specifiedToolNot applicableRuling dateBon Jovi's Selective Trademark Enforcement on Tribute Bands
Bon Jovi Productions has simultaneously authorized some tribute bands while threatening others with trademark infringement. This digest identifies the selective enforcement pattern and its implications for tribute operators and mark owners alike.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUKCourtCourt of Appeal (England and Wales)ToolNoneRuling dateMay 2, 2025Prince Harry Security Case Ends at UK Court of Appeal
The Prince Harry security litigation has concluded with a definitive Court of Appeal ruling that clarified the standard for departing from government policy, and no Supreme Court appeal is pending as of mid-2026. This update covers the procedural path, key legal holdings, and subsequent developments including the 2025 RAVEC review reopening.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionus-federalCourtNoneToolnoneRuling dateJul 23, 2026How Administrative and Criminal Paths Diverge in the Vance Leak Case
This record explains the legal posture of the JD Vance Secret Service leak investigation: the applicable statutes (18 USC §§ 793, 798), the parallel administrative and criminal tracks, the lower burden of proof on the administrative side, and the specific-intent hurdle that limits the criminal path.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionCanada, OntarioCourtHaldimand County CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 2, 2026Former CFL Player Sentenced for Intimate Partner Violence
Records the July 2, 2026 sentencing of Spencer Moore (R v Moore, Haldimand County Court, Ontario) for s. 266 assault, a conditional discharge with 15 months' probation handed down in the transitional window between Royal Assent and coming-into-force of Canada's Bills C-14 and C-16. The outcome diverges from PPSC policy discouraging conditional discharges in domestic violence cases, and the case is linked to Bill C-16's new AI-specific offences as a legislative signal for practitioners.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionCalifornia, USACourtLos Angeles Superior CourtToolNoneRuling dateJun 11, 2026Rumer Willis Custody: Coercive Control Procedure in California
An analysis of the Rumer Willis interim custody ruling as a procedural case study of California’s coercive-control framework, showing how allegations under Fam. Code §6320 trigger domestic-violence presumptions, graduated visitation ladders, and §730 evaluations.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationToolNone (compounding peptides)Ruling dateJul 24, 2026The PCAC Peptide Vote Didn't Reduce Hims' Legal Exposure
The PCAC's July 2026 peptide recommendation sent Hims stock up, but the non-binding advisory vote does not alter the company's compounding enforcement risk. This entry breaks down the vote's procedural limits, the ongoing FDA GLP-1 crackdown, and why the market reaction may overstate the near-term regulatory change.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States - Eastern District of New YorkCourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New YorkToolNo AI toolRuling dateJul 15, 2025The Legal Arc of the Haiti TPS Court Ruling from July 2025
A detailed timeline and legal analysis of the Haiti TPS litigation from the July 2025 EDNY ruling through the Supreme Court's June 2026 decision, explaining how each court ruled on reviewability and equal protection, and the current compliance deadline for TPS holders.
Last verified