Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
ALLEGEDUpdatedJurisdictionTurkeyCourtİstanbul Anatolian Chief Public Prosecutor’s OfficeToolNoneRuling dateJul 29, 2026Sinem Dedetas Detention: Key Facts in the Corruption Investigation
This record details the July 29, 2026 detention of Üsküdar Mayor Sinem Dedetas and five co-defendants in a corruption investigation involving 1.08 billion TL in alleged consultancy schemes. It traces the investigation's three phases, links to primary sources, and contextualizes the case within the broader pattern of municipal probes affecting 34 CHP-run municipalities.
Last verified
CASE-STATUS-CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FloridaCourtFlorida Supreme CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 28, 2026How Florida's Execution-Warrant Law Enabled a Double Execution
This article explains the specific statutory mechanism under Fla. Stat. § 922.06 that allowed Florida to carry out two executions on the same day in July 2026—a first since 1964—and how that sole-plenary-authority model, combined with the Timely Justice Act, compresses the warrant timeline and reduces transparency. Practitioners assessing procedural risk in Florida capital cases will understand why the state's execution process is structurally distinct and faster than almost any other.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionMissouriCourtMissouri Circuit CourtToolNoneRuling dateApr 1, 2025Legal Recourse for Cremation Against Wishes — A Triage Guide
A triage guide for litigators evaluating claims of unauthorized cremation, covering five concurrent causes of action, key jurisdictional traps, and recent six-to-seven-figure verdicts.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtFederal Aviation AdministrationToolTCAS (Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System)Ruling dateJul 27, 2026Delta Close Call: FAA Probe Highlights Five Liability Layers
An analysis of the July 27, 2026 Delta Atlanta close call identifies five distinct liability layers—FAA penalties, FTCA claims, Montreal Convention, product liability, and organizational exposure—with direct parallels to the legal risks of AI-generated outputs.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtFederal courtToolNoneRuling dateMar 31, 2026Which product liability claims stick in the Rohto eye drops recall?
This analysis evaluates the strongest product liability theories for the Rohto eye drops recall — manufacturing defect, failure-to-warn, and design defect — and discusses procedural hurdles including jurisdiction, statute of limitations, and the first-mover window created by the absence of any filed class action or MDL as of late July 2026.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionus-floridaCourtFlorida Supreme CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 28, 2026Florida Double Execution Ends 62-Year Gap, Triggers Risk Signals
Florida executed two men on July 28, 2026, for the first time in 62 years. This Risk Digest record examines the procedural irregularities — non-unanimous juries, DNA testing consumption, age-denial precedent, and execution secrecy — that counsel litigating capital cases in Florida should verify in active cases.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionPennsylvania, United StatesCourtDauphin County Court of Common PleasToolNoneRuling dateMay 20, 1981What Charges Did the Triple Six Fix Defendants Face?
A charge-level breakdown of all seven defendants in the 1980 Pennsylvania lottery rigging prosecution, including statutory bases, convictions, sentences, and the 1983 appellate affirmance.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionFloridaCourtFlorida Supreme CourtToolNo AI tool involvedRuling dateJul 28, 2026Florida Oldest Death Row Inmate Execution and Ethics Debate
Dominick Occhicone, age 80, was executed in Florida on July 28, 2026, after 38 years on death row. This article examines the ethical and constitutional debate his case ignited, including the Florida Supreme Court's rejection of an age-based Eighth Amendment exemption and the national trend of an aging death row population.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of TexasToolNoneRuling dateOct 1, 2025Why Infowars Bankruptcy Hasn't Paid Families a Cent
This procedural update explains why the Sandy Hook families have collected nothing from over $1.4 billion in defamation judgments against Alex Jones, and details the current status of the federal bankruptcy and Texas state-court tracks as of Q3 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionMichiganCourtMichigan state courtToolRedditRuling dateJul 30, 2026Legal Implications of Reddit Posts in Murder-Suicide Cases
The Karolkiewicz murder-suicide case raises critical questions about authenticating pseudonymous Reddit posts as evidence. This analysis examines the FRE 901(b)(4) pathway, hearsay exceptions, and the unresolved gaps in digital-forensic standards that litigators must navigate.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtNew York State Supreme CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 1, 2026The PGA Tour's Anti-Doping Waiver Has Limits on Judicial Review
This article examines the PGA Tour's contractual waiver of judicial review in anti-doping disputes. Using Singh and Barron case law, it shows that the clause bars direct challenges to sanction decisions but leaves room for procedural and good-faith claims to survive.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of New YorkToolNoneRuling dateJul 29, 2026Salman Rushdie Attacker's Conviction and Material Support Law
This article analyzes the July 2026 federal terrorism conviction of Salman Rushdie's attacker, Hadi Matar, focusing on how prosecutors linked a self-directed act to Hezbollah under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, and what the verdict signals about the boundaries of material support liability for independent actors.
Last verified
ALLEGEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of FloridaToolNo AI toolRuling dateJul 29, 2026Florida Professor Fired Over Short Story Sues College President
A Florida English professor filed a federal lawsuit alleging First Amendment retaliation after she was fired for teaching an award-winning short story. The case tests the limits of public college administrators' authority over classroom content following a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionIndiaCourtBombay High CourtToolAI deepfakeRuling dateJul 9, 2026Bombay High Court Queen 2 Lawsuit Maps AI Deepfake Docket
This risk-docket entry details the Phantom Studios v. JioStar Queen 2 lawsuit and explains why the same Bombay High Court bench infrastructure handling this film-sequel dispute is also India's primary venue for AI deepfake and voice-cloning personality-rights enforcement, making the convergent docket one to track for any Indian IP risk assessment.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionIdaho (state)CourtIdaho state courtToolNo specific AI toolRuling dateJul 27, 2026Bryan Kohberger's Guilty Plea Withdrawal Signals New IAC Risks
Bryan Kohberger's ineffective-assistance claim, though procedurally ordinary, arrives in a legal landscape transformed by AI sanction rulings and the United States v. Michel precedent. This analysis explains why his post-conviction posture is the template for coming AI-era IAC litigation and what risk signals appellate counsel should watch.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionMichiganCourtMichigan State CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 30, 2026Interlochen Abuse Survivors Face a Legal Dead End
The Sanghavi report documents widespread abuse at Interlochen, but Michigan's current statute of limitations bars most survivors from civil court. This article tracks the stalled Justice for Survivors legislative package and the legal barriers that remain.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS - Eleventh CircuitCourtU.S. District Court, Southern District of FloridaToolGrapheneOSRuling dateJul 20, 2026Samuel Tunick's Felony Charge Tests Duress Passcode Laws
The Samuel Tunick case marks the first criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2232(a) for using a smartphone duress-password feature to delete data before a border search. This article examines the unprecedented legal theory, the suppression motion's implications, and what the case means for legal professionals who recommend or rely on such security tools.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. CongressToolGeneral AI Legal Research ToolRuling dateJul 28, 2026How the Moreno Voter ID Bill Tests AI Research Freshness
The six-day legislative window of H.R. 7008—from House passage to Senate failure—creates a verifiable temporal freshness test for AI legal research tools. This record documents the bill's timeline so practitioners can independently check whether their tool would produce a stale status summary.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtGeorgia Superior CourtToolGlobal Tel*LinkRuling dateJul 28, 2026How jail call transcripts shaped school-shooter parent sentencing
Two landmark school-shooter parent sentencing cases—Colt Gray (2026) and James Crumbley (2024)—show how jail call recordings are admitted under relaxed sentencing rules to prove lack of remorse and continuing dangerousness. Criminal defense attorneys will learn the hearsay foundations, suppression limits, and strategic call-behavior risks that the Gray and Crumbley outcomes make clear.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS Federal (N.D. Ga.)CourtN.D. Ga.ToolGrapheneOSRuling dateDec 3, 2025Samuel Tunick Charged with Felony for Border Phone Wipe Using Duress PIN
The Samuel Tunick indictment tests whether the government can charge a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 2232(a) for using a GrapheneOS duress PIN to wipe a phone during a border search. This article examines the novel legal theory, the court's pending decision, and the broader risk for anyone relying on data-wipe, auto-reboot, or remote-erase features.
Last verified