Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
Filtered by tag jurisdiction-us-federal — clear filter
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federalCourtAnnandale Immigration CourtToolNoneRuling dateAug 1, 2026What's verified in Fatima Ameaka's immigration case
A sourced record of the Fatima Ameaka immigration case: what is verified about her July-August 2026 ICE detention and release, which status facts remain disputed between DHS and her counsel, and why her August 1 release did not end removal proceedings. All details are flagged as reported—no court order has been issued as of August 3, 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-MSCourtLafayette County Circuit Court, MississippiToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateJul 27, 2026Ole Miss Lawsuit Seeks $950,000 From Two LSU Transfers
Ole Miss's July 27, 2026 breach-of-contract suits against Princewill Umanmielen and Devin Harper after their transfers to LSU: $950,000 in combined claims, the 90-day early-termination clause, and what is reported versus primary-verified.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States (D. Colo.)CourtU.S. District Court for the District of ColoradoToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateJul 31, 2026Court grants NCAA athletes a fifth year of eligibility
Verified case record for Wisne v. NCAA (D. Colo.): Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney's July 31, 2026 nationwide class certification and preliminary injunction granting a fifth year of eligibility, the August 3–10 transfer-portal window, and the NCAA's expedited Tenth Circuit appeal — the facts to confirm before advising an institution or athlete.
Last verified
REPORTED/PENDINGUpdatedJurisdictionNew York, United StatesCourtNew York County Supreme CourtToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateAug 3, 2026Is Mamdani's city-owned grocery stores lawsuit real?
As of August 3, 2026, no complaint has been filed: the Multicultural Business Coalition board-authorized a suit over Mamdani's city-owned grocery stores and plans a City Hall letter with a roughly mid-August meet-or-file deadline. This docket-style record separates confirmed facts from reported claims and tracks the parallel Blakeman Gift and Loan threat and the already-filed rent-freeze suit.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of MassachusettsToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateMar 13, 2026Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Somalia TPS Termination
As of Aug. 3, 2026, the March 17, 2026 Somalia TPS termination is not in effect: Judge Allison D. Burroughs' administrative stay keeps it blocked, preserving work authorization and removal protection for beneficiaries while briefing continues. This verified Risk Digest record tracks the stay orders, extensions, and the compliance status employers and immigration counsel need now.
Last verified
REPORTED-NOT-CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionSouth Carolina, United StatesCourtDarlington County Magistrate CourtToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateAug 2, 2026Judge denies bond for Darlington County hit-and-run suspect
A Darlington County magistrate judge denied bond on Aug. 2, 2026, for Travis Timmons, 24, the suspect in the fatal East Billy Farrow Highway hit-and-run that killed a 15-year-old bicyclist. This record maps the reported hearing factors and custody status, and flags the case reported-not-confirmed as of Aug. 3, 2026, with the next verification steps for pretrial-risk tracking.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federalCourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkToolChatGPTRuling dateJun 22, 2023Does Jensen Huang's AI Job Advice Hold Up for Lawyers?
Jensen Huang's 'you'll lose your job to someone who uses AI' advice circulates without venues, dates, or legal-specific context. Lawyers weighing whether it holds can start with the verified quotes, the Stanford, Goldman Sachs, and Anthropic data that qualifies the advice, and the sanction record showing that the durable edge belongs to verified, policy-backed AI use.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionGermanyCourtHigher Regional Court of HammToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateMay 1, 2025Can climate attribution studies survive in court?
Attribution studies hold up in court; recurring dismissals rest on legal doctrine, not rejection of the science. Suncor before the U.S. Supreme Court is the near-term test for pending state and city climate suits and superfund statutes.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaToolChainalysisRuling dateJan 1, 2024How to Vet AI Bitcoin Money-Laundering Detection Tools
Vendor accuracy claims in the crypto-AML market outrun published evidence: only Chainalysis currently has independent peer-reviewed validation and a documented court admissibility record. This evaluation benchmarks the leading AI bitcoin money-laundering detection tools on verified accuracy and explainability, and gives legal buyers the evidence checklist to apply before procurement.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtVarious U.S. courtsToolWestlaw AI-Assisted Research, Lexis+ AI, Ask Practical Law AIRuling dateJul 29, 2024What the AI memory bottleneck means for legal AI
Advertised context windows overstate how much a legal AI model actually retains, and the resulting failure modes overlap with the citation errors that drew 2025–2026 sanctions. A bigger context window is not a risk control; under ABA Formal Opinion 512, independent verification is the safeguard that limits exposure.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS federalCourtSupreme Court of the United StatesToolnoneRuling dateFeb 20, 2026The Tariff War's Legal Toll on Northern Border Communities
Northern border crossings are posting steep documented losses — Sault Ste. Marie bridge traffic down nearly 24%, with at least $82.9M in lost local spending — while municipalities hold no direct cause of action. Relief can realistically move through four channels: Court of International Trade refund litigation, USMCA and WTO state-to-state proceedings, congressional action, and fiscal planning.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtNo courtToolAnthropicRuling dateJan 21, 2026Verify Jensen Huang's six-figure AI data center jobs claim
Jensen Huang's six-figure AI data center jobs claim is real in origin but systematically overstated in circulation. This verification workflow gives legal professionals a source-checking procedure — trace the exact quote, separate observed wages from projections, and flag unverified figures — before repeating the claim in a brief, memo, or client update.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionSpainCourtTribunal SupremoToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJun 29, 2026What Spain's Ceuta ruling means for immigration law
Spain's Supreme Court held on June 29, 2026 that the Aliens Act's summary 'hot return' regime does not apply to migrants intercepted while swimming into Ceuta or Melilla: those sea arrivals require an individual due-process procedure, while fence-climbers remain subject to summary return. This verified record sets out that holding, the operative fence–sea boundary for counsel, and why Spanish officials trace the late-July Ceuta surge to the ruling's misreading rather than to the ruling itself.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionus-federalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaToolRisk Classification Assessment (RCA), Hurricane ScoreRuling dateJan 19, 2017How a Researcher FOIA Case Exposed ICE's Detention Algorithm
How is ICE's automated custody-scoring algorithm (RCA) documented, and why did that documentation emerge only because researchers sued under FOIA? This source-linked record traces the Casper v. DHS FOIA production, the Velesaca class-action allegations over a no-release policy, and DHS's June 2026 "Retired" status for successor Hurricane Score — flagging advocacy-sourced statistics and unverified docket details as such.
Last verified
CONFIRMED; REPORTED; SCHEDULEDUpdatedJurisdictionScotland; United States; InternationalCourtScottish Court in the Netherlands; High Court of Justiciary; SCCRC; International Court of Justice; U.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaToolNo AI tool namedRuling dateAug 25, 2026Lockerbie bombing trial and legal case timeline
A source-stamped, court-by-court chronology of the Lockerbie proceedings, from the December 1988 bombing through the scheduled August 2026 jury selection in the Mas'ud prosecution — with every dated milestone tied to its ruling, court, and primary source.
Last verified
CONFIRMED; ACTIVE AFTER REMANDUpdatedJurisdictionWashington, United StatesCourtKing County Superior CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 8, 2026Tracking the growing heatwave attribution litigation docket
A filterable, primary-sourced record of the heatwave-attribution docket — jurisdiction, claims, confirmed-vs-reported status, and rulings — for counsel checking whether this liability category has reached their forum or client. The docket is verifiable and growing, but no case has yet produced a final damages award; every entry tracks procedural posture, not a monetary outcome.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS (Minnesota)CourtNo court proceedingToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJul 28, 2026Legal Implications of the Minnesota Water Cyberattack
After the July 2026 Minnesota cyberattack, utilities, municipalities, and their counsel face four possible liability fronts — EPA Safe Drinking Water Act enforcement, customer claims, cyber-insurance coverage disputes, and vendor liability. The conditions under which each front becomes actionable turn on two material facts: whether attribution to Iran is formally confirmed and whether any water contamination is ultimately found.
Last verified
UpdatedSigns of a NeeDoh Microwave Burn and the Safety Warning
NeeDoh microwave burns are a documented injury: the toy's exterior can feel cool while the heated contents injure a child's thinner skin, and the clinging gel keeps burning after contact, so a mild-looking surface may hide a deeper burn. Parents can learn to recognize the burn at each severity level, understand what the official safety warning says, and apply the critical first response — prompt gel removal and 10–20 minutes of running water — along with the home remedies to avoid and ER red flags.
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-ArizonaCourtPima County Superior CourtToolUnspecifiedRuling dateJul 1, 2026How to verify authorship of the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes
AI detectors and stylistic hunches alone cannot establish who wrote a suspicious communication. This verification workflow applies a corroboration standard to the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes, where the FBI's documented doubts rest on operational signals and the 'AI-written' label remains attributed commentary.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtNo court proceedingToolAnthropic ClaudeRuling dateJul 30, 2026What the Claude Breach Demands From Law Firms
Law firms running Claude need to know what the July 30 breach triggers and who carries the loss. This companion to the verified incident record maps the client-notification, protection, and vendor-due-diligence duties under NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2024-3 and ABA Formal Opinion 483, and separates confirmed facts from claims that still require verification.
Last verified