Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. Federal CourtsToolNoneRuling dateJul 25, 2026The Iran Strike Pause Exposes the War Powers Resolution's Blind Spot
The July 2026 Iran strike pause reveals a War Powers Resolution gap that allows the executive to reset the 60-day clock while maintaining a coercive posture—an argument no prior administration has tested. Legal practitioners will find an analysis of the constitutional stakes and potential litigation pathways.
Last verified
REPORTED - SUSPECT ARRESTED, SECOND AT LARGEUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States, Washington, King CountyCourtKing County Superior CourtToolAxon Draft OneRuling dateJul 26, 2026Space Needle Shooting Prosecution Faces AI Evidence Risk
The Seattle Space Needle shooting prosecution may face material AI-evidentiary risk because the King County Prosecutor's Office categorically rejects AI-generated police reports, yet Seattle Police have no policy prohibiting such use. This analysis explains what counsel should demand in discovery to protect against suppressed evidence or Brady violations.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUSCourtNoneToolNoneRuling dateAug 23, 2025Cynthia Klitbo's Fraud Case Reveals a Dangerous AI Hallucination Pattern
This article confirms that Cynthia Klitbo was a vishing victim, not a fraud perpetrator, and diagnoses how ambiguous queries like 'scam fraud legal case details' can cause AI legal tools to invert victim-perpetrator roles, creating sanction risk for practitioners.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court (inferred from context)ToolOpenAIRuling dateMay 18, 2026The legal shadow over Brockman's Big Bear land donation
Greg Brockman's $5.5M land trust donation to preserve eagle habitat near Big Bear comes just 67 days after a jury dismissed charitable-trust claims against him on statute-of-limitations grounds without reaching the merits. This article examines the governance and perception risks the donation creates for OpenAI and what practicing counsel should track.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionKing County, WashingtonCourtKing County Superior CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 26, 2026Three legal pathways for Bite of Seattle shooting victims
After the July 26, 2026 Bite of Seattle shooting, victims and their families can pursue three cumulative legal pathways: Washington's Crime Victim Compensation Program, criminal restitution through King County Superior Court, and civil claims against the event operator and venue. This article compares each remedy with concrete deadlines, statutory caps, and the foreseeability analysis grounded in documented prior security complaints.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionjurisdiction-euCourtEuropean Court of Human RightsToolNoneRuling dateJul 10, 2025Lance Armstrong's Human Rights Remark Signals Anti-Doping Litigation Risk
The article clarifies that Lance Armstrong's characterization of 2am anti-doping tests as a 'human rights issue' was a podcast comment, not a formal filing, but examines how that remark, alongside the 2025 Semenya Grand Chamber ruling and WADA's first Human Rights Impact Assessment, signals growing litigation risk for intrusive enforcement procedures in anti-doping and analogous regulatory regimes.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtDistrict of New JerseyToolCoreWeaveRuling dateJan 12, 2026AI Class Action Surge Threatens 5G Network Stock Valuations
The H1 2026 surge in AI-related securities class actions (18 filings, already exceeding 2025's total) has produced two durable claim templates—concealed infrastructure spending and overstated AI demand—directly transferable to publicly traded 5G and AI-network infrastructure companies. This review quantifies the filing surge, maps the claim patterns, and identifies the disclosure gaps that defense counsel and D&O underwriters should audit now.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtNot a court caseToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJul 25, 2026Why Alaska Airlines Can Deny Boarding Without Paying Cash
When Alaska Airlines denies boarding due to a document-verification glitch rather than an oversale, federal law does not require cash compensation. This article examines the Missoula incident and the regulatory gap under 14 CFR Part 250, explaining why the DOT withdrew a proposed rule that would have changed this.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionus-federalCourtSupreme Court of the United StatesToolFlock AlphaRuling dateJun 29, 2026Autonomous Police Drones Create a Fourth Amendment Vacuum
After the Supreme Court's Chatrie ruling, the legality of autonomous police drone surveillance remains unsettled. The FAA's Part 108 rule lacks warrant or data-retention requirements, leaving municipalities with over 1,000 deployed DFR programs exposed to Section 1983 liability.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-Federal, US-StateCourtU.S. District Court for the District of MarylandToolNoneRuling dateMay 5, 2026How Stefon Diggs's 2025 Legal Disputes Spread Across Five Courts
A structured record of the five distinct legal proceedings—criminal, defamation, counterclaims, and settlements—that arose from a single 2023 incident involving NFL receiver Stefon Diggs, covering jurisdictions from Maryland to Texas and illustrating how multi-front litigation evolves independently across courts.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionOhio, United StatesCourtOttawa County CourtToolNo AI tool implicatedRuling dateJul 24, 2026How Ohio Law Set Colton Smith's $1M Murder Bond in Put-in-Bay
This article explains why the $1 million bond set for Colton Smith in the Put-in-Bay murder case is procedurally standard under Ohio's post-Issue 1 bond framework, and what practitioners should know about the 10% deposit option and preliminary hearing schedule.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS Federal - Western District of WashingtonCourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of WashingtonToolNoneRuling dateJun 23, 2026Costco Dog Food Lawsuit Puts Contested Science to the Test
This article examines how the 2026 Costco Nature's Domain class action tests false-advertising liability when the FDA declined to find causation, and what it reveals about Daubert admissibility of competing scientific evidence in emerging product-liability litigation.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of the Virgin IslandsToolNoneRuling dateFeb 19, 2026Epstein will inheritance: 2026 legal update on the estate collapse
This entry tracks the Epstein estate's three active legal tracks through Q3 2026 — trust beneficiary disclosure, executor settlement, and Congressional investigation — and explains why the estate's ~80% asset collapse means most bequests will go unpaid, sourced to DOJ-released documents and court filings.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionArizonaCourtMaricopa County Superior CourtToolNo AI toolRuling dateJul 27, 2026How Circle K v. Gawlitza Redefines Lottery Ticket Ownership Risk
The ongoing $12.8 million dispute in Circle K v. Gawlitza tests whether an employee commits conversion by purchasing an unsold winning lottery ticket after a customer refused it, with the Arizona Administrative Code and persuasive Pennsylvania precedent supporting the retailer's ownership claim.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionGeorgiaCourtGeorgia Supreme CourtToolGenerative AIRuling dateMay 5, 2026Robert Shiver murder case exposes two AI dangers
The Robert Shiver murder-for-hire case and a Georgia prosecutor's AI-citation sanction bookend two distinct AI risks in criminal litigation: AI-generated content that fabricates case facts, and attorneys' own AI-generated filings that fabricate legal citations. This item documents both incidents and the shared verification duty they trigger.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtFDAToolNoneRuling dateJul 22, 2026Kroger Egg Recall Refund: Your Consumer Rights
If you bought recalled Kroger eggs, learn how to get a full refund without a receipt, what identification codes to check, and your consumer rights under the FDA recall directive, including the manufacturer hotline for discarded eggs.
Last verified
SETTLEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of WashingtonToolAmazon PrimeRuling dateSep 25, 2025Amazon Prime Settlement 2026 Eligibility and Legal Tech Risk
The Amazon Prime $2.5B settlement establishes new compliance benchmarks for subscription interfaces that directly affect legal-tech vendors and law firm procurement due diligence, beyond consumer eligibility requirements.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. Immigration Court (EOIR)ToolMobile Fortify, ELITE, Hurricane ScoreRuling dateJul 27, 2026How ICE's AI Tools Found a Southwest Flight Attendant
The detention of Southwest flight attendant Lorenzo Thompson by ICE reveals a rapidly expanding AI enforcement infrastructure that immigration lawyers must understand to challenge evidence and protect clients' due-process rights.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of FloridaToolNoneRuling dateJul 25, 2026Elaine Escoe Captured After Orchestrating $34M COVID Relief Fraud
A complete factual record of the Elaine Escoe COVID-19 relief fraud conspiracy: 90+ sham applications across four federal programs, $34M+ in improper disbursements, her 13-month fugitive status and capture in Jamaica, and the sentencing outcomes of five co-defendants that frame her exposure as the alleged ringleader.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionGermany (EU)CourtLandgericht BerlinToolAI-assisted video monitoring systemRuling dateJul 27, 2026Berlin Pride Manhunt: Legal Implications for AI Surveillance
Assesses the legal exposure of Berlin police and AI vendors after the July 2026 manhunt deployed newly authorized AI surveillance tools, analyzing compliance with the EU AI Act's prohibition on real-time biometric identification and the unresolved quorum controversy threatening the underlying German police law.
Last verified