Flagship tracker
Risk Digest
The flagship, near-daily updated database of documented AI hallucination and sanction incidents in legal proceedings worldwide. Each entry is a structured record, not a news article: jurisdiction, court, judge (if named), the AI tool implicated, penalty amount, ruling date, a confirmed-vs-reported status flag, and a link to the primary court order. Serves the 'check risk' and 'track regulation' tasks: a lawyer, risk manager, or journalist scanning for new sanctions, a specific jurisdiction, or a specific tool. Excludes narrative commentary, procedural how-to guidance (belongs in Workflows), and rule text summaries (belongs in Regulation). This group is the site's differentiation engine: freshness and per-record sourcing are the moat, so every record must carry a last-verified timestamp distinct from the ruling date.
Confirmed
A court order or docket entry has been independently verified.
Reported — unverified
Still pending independent verification against a primary source.
Filtered by tag jurisdiction-us-federal — clear filter
ALLEGEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited States (Federal)CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkToolNoneRuling dateApr 1, 2026What US Cartel Probes Mean for Mexican Politicians
The US has deployed a multi-statute enforcement framework—including FTO designations, material-support prosecutions, and civil ATA liability—to investigate and prosecute Mexican officials linked to drug cartels. This digest catalogs the active statutes, key indictments, and the cascading compliance risks for legal professionals advising clients with Mexico-facing operations.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUnited StatesCourtUnited States federal courtsToolNoneRuling dateJul 26, 2026Why Amy's Soup Recall Is Unlikely to Survive a Motion to Dismiss
Analysis of the Amy's Kitchen soup recall's legal exposure, concluding that a consumer class action for economic damages would face significant standing hurdles under recent food-recall precedent unless plaintiffs can plausibly allege purchase of actually spoiled product.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtSupreme Court of the United StatesToolNot applicableRuling dateJun 30, 2026How Nikki Hiltz Exposes a Legal Patchwork in Sports
Nikki Hiltz, the first openly nonbinary athlete in an individual Olympic track final, illustrates a structural gap in every major US sports eligibility framework: state bans, NCAA rules, and IOC policy all operate on a male/female binary, leaving nonbinary athletes without clear legal protection and subject to conflicting rules by jurisdiction and competition level.
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionD.D.C. (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia)CourtU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaToolGrammarly, ProWritingAid, Lexis+ AIRuling dateApr 3, 2026Whistleblower Attorney Sanctioned for Reckless AI Citations
A whistleblower attorney in a D.D.C. False Claims Act case was sanctioned after filing an opposition brief where all nine legal citations were fabricated by AI tools including Grammarly, ProWritingAid, and Lexis+ AI. The case illustrates the court's expectation that attorneys independently verify every citation regardless of the AI tool used.
Last verified
NO ADVERSE EVENTUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. Department of DefenseToolOracleRuling dateJul 23, 2026Oracle Pentagon Deal Signals New AI Vendor Risk for Law Firms
Oracle's $7 billion Pentagon software consolidation deal and its classified AI network clearance create an indirect but material vendor-concentration risk for any legal AI tool running on Oracle infrastructure. This article examines the deal's implications for legal-tech procurement and offers a framework for evaluating fourth-party dependency exposure.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionLouisianaCourtLafourche Parish District CourtToolNoneRuling dateApr 11, 2025What Inconsistencies Were Found in the Kyren Lacy Police Report?
A Lafourche Parish DA independent review documented multiple inconsistencies between the Louisiana State Police crash report and video evidence in the Kyren Lacy case, leading to a failed prosecution and a subsequent wrongful death lawsuit.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the District of MarylandToolNoneRuling dateJun 3, 2026How the Stefon Diggs Sexual Assault Lawsuit Unfolded in Court
A sequentially organized, docket-sourced record of the Stefon Diggs v. Christopher Griffith civil lawsuit — tracing the defamation complaint, sexual-battery counterclaim, discovery disputes, and the July 2026 motion for partial summary judgment.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationToolCetirizine Hydrochloride TabletsRuling dateJul 20, 2026Which Cetirizine Batch Numbers Carry Legal Liability
The FDA recall of cetirizine hydrochloride tablets over ranitidine cross-contamination affects four specific lots (GY825029–GY825032, NDC 16571-401-10). This record lists the batch numbers and analyzes the legal exposure under strict liability, failure-to-warn, and post-recall negligence theories, noting that no adverse events have been reported as of July 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtFDAToolNoneRuling dateJul 21, 2026Brooklyn Roasting Cold Brew Recall Opens Product Liability Risk
A structured incident record of the July 2026 Brooklyn Roasting Works cold brew concentrate recall (~3,048 gallons, Class II botulism risk), examining the product-liability exposure for every entity in the NY/NJ distribution chain. No illnesses have been reported as of July 21, 2026.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionSierra LeoneCourtSierra Leone High CourtToolNot applicableRuling dateJul 25, 2026Can Sierra Leone extradite Bolle Jos without a treaty?
An examination of Sierra Leone's Extradition Act of 1974 reveals that no bilateral treaty is required for Bolle Jos's extradition to the Netherlands, but procedural choke points and political factors have stalled the process for over 18 months.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtVariousToolEtchedRuling dateJul 25, 2026Five Legal Risks That Could Derail Etched's $10.3B Valuation
Business coverage of Etched's rapid valuation growth has overlooked five distinct legal risk vectors—export controls, CFIUS exposure, antitrust exit risk, IP concentration, and securities-disclosure obligations—that could materially alter its trajectory toward a reported $20B target.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationToolGenerative AIRuling dateJul 20, 2026Cetirizine Cross-Contamination Recall Legal Research Risks
The July 2026 cetirizine/ranitidine cross-contamination recall creates novel product-liability research challenges where AI tools are prone to hallucinate FDA timelines, preemption frameworks, MDL settlements, and case citations. This Risk Digest record provides recall facts, analogous cases, and the specific hallucination risks litigators must verify before filing.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaToolChatGPTRuling dateMay 1, 2026Greg Brockman's $50M Donations Create Legal Risk for OpenAI Users
An analysis of the fiduciary, reputational, and ethical risks that Greg Brockman's $50 million political donations pose for OpenAI and the law firms that rely on its tools, and what risk managers should do about it.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS - OhioCourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of OhioToolNot applicableRuling dateJul 16, 2026Can Strict Liability Claims Succeed in the Cyclosporiasis Outbreak?
Plaintiffs in the 2026 cyclosporiasis outbreak face severe causation hurdles even under strict liability, because Cyclospora cannot be cultured or genetically traced—a unique forensic problem that produces Daubert-level challenges and shapes settlement ranges from $25,000 to $1 million per case.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionWashington, United StatesCourtWashington State Superior CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 23, 2026Who Faces Liability After the Kenmore Air Plane Crash?
This article maps the multi-defendant liability landscape after the Kenmore Air Flight 140 crash in Puget Sound, identifying potential claims against the operator and manufacturer under Washington tort law and unresolved admiralty jurisdiction issues that control where and under what rules a case can be filed.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtU.S. District CourtToolAIRuling dateJul 2, 2026Authenticating the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes under FRE 901
This analysis examines how the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes present a novel authentication challenge under FRE 901(b)(4) and (b)(9), given the digital submission method, non-public details, and potential AI authorship, and highlights the risks of relying on pre-trial law enforcement statements before judicial determination.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionCaliforniaCourtLos Angeles County Superior CourtToolNoneRuling dateJul 2, 2026A Thrown Toddler Exposes Fitness-Club Daycare Liability Gaps
The Kittle v. Bay Club lawsuit — filed July 2026 — crystallizes three liability vectors for fitness clubs operating unlicensed daycare: direct negligence, post-incident fraud exposure, and a disputed licensing exemption under California Health and Safety Code §1596.792(k).
Last verified
CONFIRMEDUpdatedJurisdictionTexas, United StatesCourtState Bar of Texas Professional Ethics CommitteeToolNo AI toolRuling dateMay 1, 2025Elle Fanning's Discretion Reveals a Hidden NDA Ethics Risk
The upcoming legal drama 'Discretion' dramatizes a real ethics trap: lawyers who sign or draft NDAs without understanding state bar restrictions risk violating confidentiality duties and their own right to practice. This article breaks down the applicable Texas opinion and ABA guidance for law firm training.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS FederalCourtHouse Judiciary CommitteeToolNo AI toolRuling dateJun 25, 2026The Three Articles of Impeachment Against Linda McMahon
This Risk Digest record documents the three articles of impeachment filed against Education Secretary Linda McMahon under H.Res.1391, detailing the specific allegations, corroborating evidence from the ED OIG flash report, and the procedural status of the first impeachment ever filed against a Secretary of Education.
Last verified
REPORTED — UNVERIFIEDUpdatedJurisdictionUS-FederalCourtFederal District CourtToolNo specific AI toolRuling dateFeb 13, 2026Why the FBI Could Not Access Nancy Guthrie Evidence for Four Days
This article examines the legal framework behind the four-day delay in FBI access to evidence in the Nancy Guthrie abduction case, analyzing how statutory jurisdiction under the Federal Kidnapping Act and the division of operational authority between federal and local law enforcement created a critical evidence gap.
Last verified